“Government of the people, by the people, for the people, will not disappear from the earth.”

Unfortunately, these days those words and goals are not yet implemented and probably never will be implemented. There are too many interests involved in establishing such an ideal government. Too much ego, prejudice, and conflicting economic, social, and many other interests are involved in the basic ingredients to merge such a government. Perhaps it should be so in the name of democracy and freedom of choice; perhaps the people do not deserve such an ideal government.

The biggest problem is generating the desired balance between all those ideals and desires. The two extreme possibilities are a government with too much power and a weak and divided government that is incapable of making crucial decisions. A government or organization with sufficient resources can do almost anything. Not only that, they can even publicly justify their actions in the name of preserving and protecting democracy. They will support your actions, which may be illegal, immoral, or even criminal in the name of justice, for the people and the nation. Balancing between a completely open society where everything is transparent, visible and known to all and a closed society where certain actions and information are known to few is a very difficult task. “People don’t have to know everything” may be justified in certain cases. Surveys have already shown that people’s moods can be easily manipulated and changed direction over time, events, and advertising.

Governments can, if they so choose, eliminate certain groups or individuals that they believe are opposed and hostile to their policies. The elimination of a terrorist or a political opponent is as easy to achieve as it is easy to hide from the public. The death or disappearance of these people is explained in categories such as natural causes, accidents, mental hospitalization or death during emergency surgery.

All agencies, official and unofficial, such as the CIA, MI5/6, KGB and Mossad, were and will be doing “it” in the name of national security. The popular public reason may be: “To protect, preserve, or even enforce Democracy.” In certain cases, those actions may be truly justified; the problem is where to put the limit. Many people have disappeared around the world in the name of national security.

The national security reason for not disclosing certain information or imprisoning an unwanted subject is used too often by many countries and organizations.

Governments mainly operate at three levels. While level one is the clean, white level of activity, reserved for heads of state and highly exposed political figures, level two is the gray area. This is an area of ​​unethical activity that stinks but is still legal. Killing, eliminating, removing, and counterfeiting are part of level three. Normally “we the people” are exposed to level one and occasionally level two, but rarely level three.

At level three, I can mention, for example, Gerald Bull, the Canadian engineer who developed the Babylon long-range artillery or “super gun” for the Iraqi government. Bull was assassinated in Brussels, Belgium, in March 1990.

It is very interesting to note the evolution of language regarding the use of politically correct terminology. Word washing is quite fascinating. Terms like “terrorists” or “freedom fighters,” “guerrillas,” “political assassinations,” or “remove from power” depend on which side you ask or talk about.

The United States is a superpower with a global presence and intervention. In general, they are a stabilizing factor. Many Americans do not understand the importance of their support for certain countries, and at the same time, many supported countries simply hate their presence.

To better understand the above, try to imagine a world without the involvement of the United States. Suppose the US is not a superpower or evolved from an empire to a regular republic primarily interested in its internal affairs.

What would the world be like without the intervention of the United States?

Oil is one of the main energy resources of most modern countries. Oil was one of the main reasons for the wars and the invasion of Kuwait by Saddam Hussein. It was not a territorial dispute; it was about oil. Americans are one of the biggest consumers of oil, so it’s obvious why the US was interested in helping Kuwait.

However, this is not the whole picture. The involvement of the United States throughout the world is not only for oil and monetary interests. Most people believe that there are other reasons. In the age of a globalized economy, world stability is essential, and according to Chaos theory, even a small problem in the Middle East, for example, can set off a chain reaction that affects the US in many areas. Most people believe that global US intervention is also because they care. They are concerned with establishing and maintaining democracies and allowing freedom for all in all possible places. Obviously there are other reasons and interests; So what are they?

China is becoming a major player on the world stage. They are the second largest consumers of oil. The oil route to China is secured and enabled by the US Navy. China’s long term goal might be to catch up with the US and they can achieve it.

Without the US, Taiwan would cease to exist as a democracy and could be annexed by mainland China. Without the US, Japan would have to obtain nuclear capabilities if it wanted to remain independent. They have had an ongoing dispute with China since 1937, and the Chinese will never forget the Japanese invasion. The United States indirectly helped Iran by removing Saddam Hussein, who had fought Iran over a border dispute for eight years. Saddam Hussein was interested in making Iraq an influential power in the Persian Gulf region. He invaded Iran not only because of the long history of border disputes, but also to increase Iraq’s oil reserves. Europe wants and needs oil, but it is not willing to pay the full price to get it. They hate the American presence and will not recognize that without the United States they would not get the oil they need.

Europe’s attitude towards Israel is extremely hypocritical. They have a short memory; however, what unites Europe against Israel or the Jews is anti-Semitism.

Since March 2003, when Recep Tayyip Erdogan became Prime Minister of Turkey, his policy towards Israel has changed. Erdogan was not happy with Israel’s reaction to Hezbollah’s 2006 kidnapping of soldiers; he was critical when Israel conducted the Gaza War; he asked to inspect Israel’s nuclear facilities under IAEA inspection; and has criticized Israel for its many defensive actions.

Tension between the countries has intensified following the flotilla attack on Gaza.

The question is what his motives are and whether he has a hidden agenda that might explain his excessive attention to Israel. His reactions have won Turkey’s influence and sympathy among its Arab neighbors. In particular, it may have obtained certain advantages among its national political parties. His collaborative focus and meetings with Syria and Iran should worry the West and particularly Israel.

The Kurdistan Workers’ Party or PKK, founded in 1978, is a Kurdish organization fighting against Turkey. Their goal is to establish an independent Kurdish state.

Germany claims that the Turkish army has used chemical weapons against members of the PKK.

Lebanon is a puppet country controlled by Syria and Iran. Hezbollah or “The Party of God” is a Shiite Islamic organization involved in Lebanese politics, supported by Syria and Iran. In reality, they are viewed by most of the world as a terrorist organization.

Its forces are trained and organized by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. Its main objective is to eliminate the colonial entity in Lebanon and establish an Islamic regime.

To achieve that, the Iranians with their supporters are all united under their hatred of Israel and their desire to eliminate the Zionist entity from the region.

A top-secret CIA document released in April 2004 lists possible suspects in the assassination of Elie Hobeika, a former commander of the Lebanese forces.

Potential culprits include fellow Christians, other members of the Lebanese elite, Palestinians, and Israelis.

There is no direct evidence of Israeli involvement in the assassination, but highlighting an Israeli connection could help the Lebanese avoid the internal friction that would arise if a Lebanese group was blamed.

Anyone who thinks that the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is over territory is totally wrong.

The Israelis are willing to return certain territories and make peace in exchange for a piece of paper… Unfortunately, according to history, those signed agreements have a very short lifespan. In the volatile Middle East region, Israel will face many difficulties without US support. In the 1980s, the Soviet military forces in Afghanistan faced a different type of warfare than they had experienced in the past. The resistance forces fighting against them were the mujahideen.

Makhtab Al-Khidamat (MAK) was founded by Osama Bin Laden and Abdullah Azzam, which led to the establishment of Al-Qaeda in 1988. At the end of the Soviet occupation they wanted to extend and justify their operations, so they tried to include other causes islamic It is quite obvious that Al-Qaeda benefited from the US funding and training given to the Afghan mujahideen fighting the Soviet invasion.

There are many Al-Qaeda cells that are operating around the world. Without united cooperation, they will continue their terrorist operations, including their attempt to obtain nuclear-related weapons.